The situation is also complicated by
the fact that Anne’s legacy is managed by several different parties. This includes
the Anne Frank House museum in the Netherlands and the Swiss-based Anne Frank Fonds.
For the last five years, the Anne Frank House had been working with historians
and researchers to publish a web-based version of the diary once it came under
public domain. However, these efforts will not immediately launch as a result
of these proceedings. Following the war, Mr. Frank dispersed much of Anne’s tangible
legacy to various institutions, which makes the matter more complicated. We’ve
seen this time and again in issues of ownership and copyright when things are
donated to archival institutions.
It is also a basic issue of creator
and provenance. The Anne Frank House museum issued a statement and countered that
Anne is the sole author of her diary.[1]
However, an extension of the copyright will limit Anne’s legacy rather than
further it, which seems counter to what the Anne Frank Fonds wants to accomplish.
The stewards of the Anne Frank Museum, as part of their mission, hope to “disseminate”
the life of Anne as widely as possible. This recent development hinders in some
ways their ability to achieve their mission. It will be interesting to see how
the story plays out and how the archival institution within the House museum
fights to demand that the copyright enter into the public domain.
No comments:
Post a Comment